Banner image placeholder
Banner image

Comparison of two approaches to interpretive use arguments


Journal article


Michele B. Carney, Angela R. Crawford, C. Siebert, R. Osguthorpe, K. Thiede
Applied Measurement in Education, vol. 32, 2019, pp. 10--22


Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Carney, M. B., Crawford, A. R., Siebert, C., Osguthorpe, R., & Thiede, K. (2019). Comparison of two approaches to interpretive use arguments. Applied Measurement in Education, 32, 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2018.1544138


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Carney, Michele B., Angela R. Crawford, C. Siebert, R. Osguthorpe, and K. Thiede. “Comparison of Two Approaches to Interpretive Use Arguments.” Applied Measurement in Education 32 (2019): 10–22.


MLA   Click to copy
Carney, Michele B., et al. “Comparison of Two Approaches to Interpretive Use Arguments.” Applied Measurement in Education, vol. 32, 2019, pp. 10–22, doi:10.1080/08957347.2018.1544138.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{carney2019a,
  title = {Comparison of two approaches to interpretive use arguments},
  year = {2019},
  journal = {Applied Measurement in Education},
  pages = {10--22},
  volume = {32},
  doi = {10.1080/08957347.2018.1544138},
  author = {Carney, Michele B. and Crawford, Angela R. and Siebert, C. and Osguthorpe, R. and Thiede, K.}
}


Share

Text Only Owlstown
QR Code
Translate to